3 ms·

> I wish people would look at this from both sides. How does she know that Aaron was truly innocent? I bet she had expert witnesses on her side saying that Aar

> I wish people would look at this from both sides. How does she know that Aaron was truly innocent? I bet she had expert witnesses on her side saying that Aaron was doing something illegal and excessive. Everyone is saying that he had access to download those files. But the prosecutor is looking at all of his seemingly suspicious behavior. It's condescending to say people aren't looking at both sides. You are actually now arguing that either she was incompetent because she picked bad expert witnesses or she had bad judgement in how hard she prosecuted. After she had all the facts in front of her, she threatened him with 35 years for it. As someone else posted above, if he had stole the hard drive with the 4 million documents on it, it wouldn't be a felony.

berlinbrown 14y ago
"You are actually now arguing that either she was incompetent because she picked bad expert witnesses or she had bad judgement in how hard she prosecuted." I didn't say that or imply it. On the other side. I have heard that Aaron had access to the documents. I have heard that MIT is an open access type of campus. I have heard things that claim that the prosecutor's case was in error. But, I have heard little about the validity of the case. I guess that the prosecutors reviewed the CFAA laws and other similar cases. I am saying that the case should have proceeded forward. I would have liked have heard from both sides. Others say she should be fired and that the case was invalid.