3 ms·
So, you might either rejoice or be angry that we have a similar feature in the works. Currently, its for code-sharing only, not assets. See the discussion on ho
by Argorak 14y ago
So, you might either rejoice or be angry that we have a similar feature in the works. Currently, its for code-sharing only, not assets. See the discussion on how we address our personal pains with engines.
https://github.com/padrino/padrino-framework/pull/1007 https://github.com/padrino/padrino-framework/pull/1007
- jacquesc 14y agoRejoice of course! Would be really nice to still have the option of not wrapping of course, but distributing some apps via Gems is a nice feature too.
- Argorak 14y agoNo existing functionality was harmed in the making of this feature :). Multiple apps are not going anywhere, especially because they are a very nice way of seperating things without the overhead of having a gem somewhere else that is hard to keep track of. Actually, the initial commit didn't even touch any existing methods.