This study is a non-issue until Microsoft actually publishes it. Until then, this boils down to "Microsoft says it has found proof, proof, that its products ar

This study is a non-issue until Microsoft actually publishes it. Until then, this boils down to "Microsoft says it has found proof, proof, that its products are cheaper than linux, this proof is very well substantiated, so well in fact, that we won't publish the study. But really, do believe us. We even paid someone else to do the study for us. It's solid! It shows it all! You don't have to believe us, because it is proven. At least to those who get to see it. Which means Microsoft. But really!" > Langkabel declined to break down the costs into individual positions. "Of course it includes licence fees," Langkabel corrected a report to the contrary released by Focus Money Online on Monday, adding that the study also considers costs incurred through "tuition, training, migration, templates, roll-out and deployment and the integration of subject-related procedures". "The study is reliable", said Langkabel. If it is reliable, publish it so we can assess those claims. Until then, this can be understood as spreading FUD.