3 ms·
I'd argue you haven't got a clue what you are talking about and compensate by resorting to cliched moralizing. Everyone would snap given sufficient provocation,
by epo 14y ago
I'd argue you haven't got a clue what you are talking about and compensate by resorting to cliched moralizing. Everyone would snap given sufficient provocation, a 'cheating spouse' is very provocative, to call it "poor impulse control" is, at best, sanctimonious.
- kbenson 14y ago> Everyone would snap given sufficient provocation Depending on your definition of "snap", this is unsubstantiated opinion, not a fact deserving the assertion you used. It may be that everyone will "snap" if provoked enough if by "snap" you mean become aggressive, possibly entering into a fight, but even then you'll have to sell me that everyone is susceptible to this. If you define "snap" as taking of another's life when there is no direct threat to your own (which is usually what we are talking about when discussing the murdering of a spouse), then I think you have a LOT of evidence you need to bring forth.
- pavel_lishin 14y agoIf by "cliched moralizing" you mean arguing that murdering a spouse is, in fact, immoral, then sure. I'm a cliched idiot.
- aaron695 14y agoI'm guessing you are just a child or a troll. When you get older you'll realise all marriages and lives have their ups and downs. If a 'cheating spouse' is the worse you have to deal with you'll have lived a lucky or short life. Death of loved ones, marriage break ups, losing jobs is life. Get over it. It happens to all of us, this me, me, me mentality that we live in a hollywood movie and just because theses things happen to us it's a world event gets a bit tiring.