2 ms·
It's GNU policy - see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html
by cygx 14y ago
It's GNU policy - see http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.en.html
- viraptor 14y agoThe irony here is really hard to miss: "By releasing libraries that are limited to free software only, we can help each other's free software packages outdo the proprietary alternatives."
- cygx 14y agoYou have to get into the GNU mindset here: If you consider non-free software immoral and your ultimate goal is to outlaw it, providing libraries which can be used by proprietary software makes you guilty of aiding and abetting.