3 ms·

It's not necessary to include that clause. Many software packages don't. When they talk about making a package GPLv2+, instead of GPLv2, I believe that's the d

by e1ven 14y ago

It's not necessary to include that clause. Many software packages don't. When they talk about making a package GPLv2+, instead of GPLv2, I believe that's the distinction they're talking about.

sigzero 14y ago
No, if the clause isn't in there then it doesn't apply. You can talk about anything you want.
- e1ven 14y ago
  sigzero - We don't disagree ;) I was referring to what the article was "talking about", with /their/ GPLv2+ terminology. If you license it as GPLv2, it's GPLv2 only.