Not the GP commenter, but I invite you to read some of the other blog posts. In my brief skim through previous posts, I didn't see anything that immediately str

Not the GP commenter, but I invite you to read some of the other blog posts. In my brief skim through previous posts, I didn't see anything that immediately struck me as beyond the pale, but the whole "saying a lot to trick you into believing there's a profound argument" idea stood out. An overabundance of historical tie-ins, unnecessarily flowery language... although it's possible that the author is a great writer or I'm a poor reader, I strongly suspect that the simpler explanation -- the absence of a credible argument -- is correct.