4 ms·

To be honest, I somehow missed the possibility that it was a parody, as well. Which brings me to something a little 'meta' as far as this goes: What are some go

by nandan 19y ago

To be honest, I somehow missed the possibility that it was a parody, as well. Which brings me to something a little 'meta' as far as this goes: What are some good heuristics / algorithms to determine if something is a parody? :)

jey 19y ago
With the current political climate, I don't think such a litmus test actually exists.
- byrneseyeview 19y ago
  "When Henry Kissinger won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1973, the distinguished musical satirist Tom Lehrer decided that he could no longer perform. "It was at that moment that satire died," says Lehrer, "There was nothing more to say after that."" http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/documentaries/features/feature_kissinger_profile.shtml http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/documentaries/features/feature_...
gojomo 19y ago
It's more satire than parody. Some helpful heuristics: (1) Is the author saying "things you can't say" in a place where normally the rules apply? (Bloomberg isn't an especially politically-incorrect news/opinion outlet.) (2) Is the author out of character? This could have been written under a haughty pseudonym ("Edgar Charles Hyannisport, III") -- but was under the name of author Michael Lewis instead, who's written popular books about finance, business, technology, and sports. If a professional writer offends, you can figure they calculated to offend in service of their real persuasive/entertainment goals. (3) Does the presentation match the implied mindset? Even people with similar views don't present them in this way, if they want to be effective. (4) Gradual progression of implausibility. Lewis starts merely speaking more crudely than typical of "the poor", but then goes to the absurd (the poor should have teams of lawyers) and proceeds to talk of debtor's prisons and requiring menial labor of the indebted. A slow build keeps readers guessing, for at least a little while, while eventually causing most/all to realize the author is being facetious.
- oditogre 19y ago
  Your last clue should've been the biggest. If you read the article through to the part about dressing poor people up as clowns and seeing how many you could shove into a Maybach as entertainment at rich kids' birthday parties and still thought the author was being serious, your satire detector really, really needs a tune-up.
richcollins 19y ago
The fact that the author is from Berkeley is a good hint ;)

by nandan 19y ago

jey 19y ago

With the current political climate, I don't think such a litmus test actually exists.

byrneseyeview 19y ago
"When Henry Kissinger won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1973, the distinguished musical satirist Tom Lehrer decided that he could no longer perform. "It was at that moment that satire died," says Lehrer, "There was nothing more to say after that."" http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/documentaries/features/feature_kissinger_profile.shtml http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcfour/documentaries/features/feature_...

gojomo 19y ago

It's more satire than parody. Some helpful heuristics: (1) Is the author saying "things you can't say" in a place where normally the rules apply? (Bloomberg isn't an especially politically-incorrect news/opinion outlet.) (2) Is the author out of character? This could have been written under a haughty pseudonym ("Edgar Charles Hyannisport, III") -- but was under the name of author Michael Lewis instead, who's written popular books about finance, business, technology, and sports. If a professional writer offends, you can figure they calculated to offend in service of their real persuasive/entertainment goals. (3) Does the presentation match the implied mindset? Even people with similar views don't present them in this way, if they want to be effective. (4) Gradual progression of implausibility. Lewis starts merely speaking more crudely than typical of "the poor", but then goes to the absurd (the poor should have teams of lawyers) and proceeds to talk of debtor's prisons and requiring menial labor of the indebted. A slow build keeps readers guessing, for at least a little while, while eventually causing most/all to realize the author is being facetious.

oditogre 19y ago
Your last clue should've been the biggest. If you read the article through to the part about dressing poor people up as clowns and seeing how many you could shove into a Maybach as entertainment at rich kids' birthday parties and still thought the author was being serious, your satire detector really, really needs a tune-up.

richcollins 19y ago

The fact that the author is from Berkeley is a good hint ;)