4 ms·

> At the very least, AT&T should be able to sue you for the breach of contract and get their $350 back. That's exactly what they do, except that a lawsuit isn'

by jmj42 14y ago

> At the very least, AT&T should be able to sue you for the breach of contract and get their $350 back. That's exactly what they do, except that a lawsuit isn't necessary. It's already part of the contract. Specifically, AT&T charges $350 - ($10 * <number of months used>). And, I agree, that's actually quite fair. http://www.wireless.att.com/learn/articles-resources/early-term-fees.jsp http://www.wireless.att.com/learn/articles-resources/early-t... Edit: Added link to AT&T termination fees

cbr 14y ago
$350 - ($10 * <number of months used>) Weird; that would make more sense for a three year contract.
- brodney 14y ago
  Seems like it's weighted to be more beneficial earlier in the contract, and later on makes more sense as the user to see the contract through to the end.