3 ms·
I second this idea. I've wondered a long time why there isn't more development of nonlethal weapons, something like a stun / tranquilizer gun. I don't want a
by GFischer 14y ago
I second this idea.
I've wondered a long time why there isn't more development of nonlethal weapons, something like a stun / tranquilizer gun.
I don't want a gun for my own self-defense, because, once you have a gun, and actually target someone, you have to be WILLING to fire it, and live with the consequences (automatic jail time here in my country, except in the most strenuous self-defense, and then only if the assailant had a gun himself).
However, I'm strongly considering a Taser for myself, after witnessing a particularly appalling mugging (I was to slow to intervene, which is actually a good thing, because I'm overweight and out of shape, I would have been beaten up).
- expralitemonk 14y agoSelf defense sprays have come a long way in 30 years, and they can stop a bear. In fact a person using bear spray to stop a bear attack is less likely to be injured than a person using a gun. http://www.bearsmart.com/docs/BearSprayVsBullets.pdf http://www.bearsmart.com/docs/BearSprayVsBullets.pdf
- GFischer 14y agoWell, there are no bears or dangerous wildlife in my country (except maybe for some bulls), but there are a lot of "planchas" which is the local brand of ghetto people, and drunk aggressive homeless people, and I've come close to getting hurt twice already this year. I should look into a self-defense spray though :), with the added benefit of them being much cheaper.