4 ms·
It's certainly not Twitter's fault. Lately, the open source community's underbelly has been exposed. "But open source is right and we are the good guys?!", or.
by timinman 14y ago
It's certainly not Twitter's fault. Lately, the open source community's underbelly has been exposed.
"But open source is right and we are the good guys?!", or...
"But I know those guys and they are usually really cool!"
We want to categorize people as being bad or good, and it messes with our brain when we think we may have to re-categorize. It's more useful to realize that we all have a capacity to do both good and harm. It's also more useful to judge ourselves than others. Recognizing the need to change is the beginning. I know that I need Outside help to maximize the good and minimize the bad that I am capable of.
- brazzy 14y agoYes, it's partially Twitter's fault. Enforced brevity in a popularity contest setting encourages smartassery and discourages (or makes impossible) nuanced expression.
- anu_gupta 14y agoTwitter isn't coming up to anyone, twisting their arm and telling them to be a dick. Lots of people manage to use Twitter without coming across like assholes. If one feels that 140 characters isn't sufficient to correctly represent one's nuanced thoughts, then don't tweet.
- SimHacker 14y agoAnd that's why I don't tweet!
- brazzy 14y agoThat's a main reason why I don't. But I gather that in some circles the social pressure to tweet is not much short of arm twisting. I doubt you could find many twitter accounts (barring commercial PR stuff) whose history is entirely free of rudeness.
- mpyne 14y ago> Lately, the open source community's There is no "open source hivemind" so please don't disparage the millions of open source coders who will never make the frontpage of HN by lumping the entire conglomerate into one community.
- timinman 14y agoSorry, I didn't mean to disparage open source or people creating open source software - I love it!. The point I was trying to make was that even people with good ideals are fallible.