I have played the middle ground on this issue. I was trying to see it from the eye's the prosecutors or the law as it is concerned with the Computer Fraud and

I have played the middle ground on this issue. I was trying to see it from the eye's the prosecutors or the law as it is concerned with the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. How do they craft law that is generic enough to catch guys like meev but flexible that people like Aaron are found not guilty. I tell others, maybe the severity of the charges were harsh in Aaron's case but I was wondering if we should have had a trial proceed and hear the facts. Others argue that we shouldn't have had a trial and the prosecutor should be fired. But how do we know for sure that Aaron didn't commit a crime?