1) This page in no way is related to page missing (404). My response that it is not a 404 page is correct. This page has nothing to do with 404 error. 2) I mad

1) This page in no way is related to page missing (404). My response that it is not a 404 page is correct. This page has nothing to do with 404 error. 2) I made an assumption, based on the context, that this page was serving a role that is used when the server is overloaded or otherwise unavailable. In that case, this page should not be serving a 200 status, it should be serving a 50X response. Now, it's possible that this page is just a demonstration of the error that would normally be produced when the website is unavailable. In that case, sure, 200 status is proper since it's not meant to actually be the literal error page which is served when the site has gone down. It's also possible the page has logic in it to serve 200 error when requested directly and 50X when the server is down. In really, I bet this page is served as-is when the website is unavailable and sends a 200 error. It's difficult to know whether or not this is true until we see a real problem with the server.