2 ms·
I get your but point Point No. 6 in the Colligan affidavit says a different version - Mr. Jobs proposed an arrangement between Palm and Apple by which
by denzil_correa 14y ago
I get your but point Point No. 6 in the Colligan affidavit says a different version -
Mr. Jobs proposed an arrangement between Palm and Apple
by which neither company would hire the others' employees.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/121737673/Colligan-Affidavit http://www.scribd.com/doc/121737673/Colligan-Affidavit
Note - there is no version of "active" or "non active" in the statement. It simply says no hiring ex-Palm/Apple employees. I simply see no reason why this should exist. Why should there be a collusion between company X and Y on a legal platform ?
- monochromatic 14y ago"Why should this be the case?" is a far cry from "this is criminal."
- denzil_correa 14y agoYou can call it whatever you want to - what name do you prefer?