8 ms·
THQ Dissolved
- amishforkfight 14y agoAs someone whose employer just underwent Chapter 11 and a subsequent sale, I hope that the power-jousting, cockfights, backstabbing, and general dumbassery that I experienced will not happen to the members of THQ. The lengths some people will go through for some token of power...
- minimaxir 14y agoIronically, you just described the gameplay of THQ-published Saint's Row 3.
- csmattryder 14y agoShame, they were one of the only publishers willing to take the risk on a new IP. Which other publisher would dare take on the offensive, lewd sandbox game like Saint's Row, each sequel just a little more over the top than the last? In a market full of repetitive sequels, played out plotlines, and annual cash-cows, I'm hoping Koch Media do Volition and Saint's Row 4 justice!
- doktrin 14y agoThe success of saints row exemplifies not only willingness to take on risk, but the importance and value of iteration towards success. Saints row 1 was largely forgettable, 2 became interesting, and 3 is a sandbox classic, out shining in many ways even GTA IV. The combination of novel ideas and willingness to improve and change is such a crucial combination when developing a product.
- officemonkey 14y agoThe more I play Saints Row 3, the more I'm convinced it's the finest Sandbox game since GTA: San Andreas.
- yareally 14y agoThankfully EA, Activision or one of the other more cookie cutter publishers did not get ahold of Saints Row and Metro. If they did, each series might as well have died with THQ. I think I would be sick to see Metro or Saints Row turned into a Call of Duty or Medal of Honor knockoff. EA just is not what it used to be and all my favorite classic franchises (Command and Conquer, C&C Red Alert, Sim City, Syndicate, etc) are just a shadow of what they once were.
- ekianjo 14y ago> EA just is not what it used to be and all my favorite classic franchises (Command and Conquer, C&C Red Alert, Sim City, Syndicate, etc) are just a shadow of what they once were. The games you quoted were not FROM EA per se, they were mostly from studios acquired by EA which were dissolved soon after they released something worthy of publishing. Sim City was from Maxix, SYndicate from Bullfrog, CC from Westwood. Do not assume developer=publisher.
- yareally 14y agoI'm aware of who developed/published them :). EA is also a developer and not just a publisher. I'd guess as they acquired each one, they became more prominent in the decisions for each franchise as well as hirings of future developers. Westwood and Maxis as far as I can see, ceased to exist when they were acquired and the games they put out shortly after were running on the inertia they had before acquisition. I played on Westwood's multiplayer servers back in the 90s. EA carried on letting Command and Conquer series be pretty good up until Red Alert 3 (bad) and Command & Conquer 4 (horrible), which were made long after Westwood was absorbed[1]. Even Sim City 4 was pretty good and that was published long after Maxis had been swallowed. My point was, EA is where good games go to die, regardless of who develops them. It wasn't always that way, but something shifted in the company over the past 10 years. Their current mode of operation is treat PC as a second class platform, recycle instead of create, appeal to the lowest common denominator for marketing[2] and stuff as much social/online interaction as they can with no way to opt out[3]. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westwood_Studios http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westwood_Studios [2] https://encrypted.google.com/search?q=red+alert+3+women&hl=en&client=opera&hs=QTZ&sa=X&tbo=d&complete=0&pws=0&tbm=isch&sout=1&biw=1324&bih=834 https://encrypted.google.com/search?q=red+alert+3+women&... [3] http://www.simcity.com/en_US/blog/article/The-Benefits-of-Live-Service http://www.simcity.com/en_US/blog/article/The-Benefits-of-Li... Edit: some clarifications and citations.
- sliverstorm 14y agoShame, they were one of the only publishers willing to take the risk on a new IP. Sadly, the worst part is not that an adventuresome publisher is no longer with us. The worst part is that all the other publishers will now be that much more afraid of being adventuresome.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- bunderbunder 14y agoI suspect that Saint's Row is most notable for how exceptional it is compared to the rest of THQ's line-up. Not being an Xbox owner, I can't say I've played it, but I'll accept for the sake of argument that it is a truly original game and not just a well-made GTA look-alike. So even given that, to me the main thing THQ's name brings to mind is the endless stream of games they churned out under licensing agreements with various TV and movie franchises. If I were going to pick a game company to be the poster child for unoriginal cash cows, the maker of all those SpongeBob, Kung Fu Panda and WWF games would absolutely be a top candidate.
- yareally 14y agoSaints Row 3 is also on PC. You can find it cheap during one of the seasonal Steam sales (under 10 dollars recently). Does not take a mega PC to run it either in requirements. If you only roll with Linux or OSX, it's old enough it should run fine with Wine.
- sesqu 14y agoIt was released in the fall of 2011. I would be surprised if it ran well under wine.
- yareally 14y agoIt might have some stability issues (I haven't seen anything posted about it with Wine in over a year now though), but if one can get it running, I don't think it would perform that bad. It would depend on if you wanted it to work with the dx11 graphics or dx9 option. Dx9 is all consoles get so it wouldn't be horrible. The game is also nowhere as graphically impressive as some other PC games (Witcher 2, original Crysis, Deus Ex). Lots of low res textures in it that were not improved when porting from the consoles. Don't get me wrong, I love the game, but it's a console port at heart and has the side-effects that come from porting it without improving graphically really. It wasn't a game I played for the graphics though and not something to nitpick really.
- 14y ago
- venomsnake 14y agoMetro and CoH 2 seems to be safe. Southpark may be in trouble, and Obsidian are in no need of additional trouble right now. And Ubisoft don't know what an RPG is. Darksiders are done which is sad.
- chris11 14y agoUbisoft wants to buy South Park, but it looks like there may be legal trouble. South Park Studios filed a complaint saying that THQ did not have the legal right to sell South Park as long as South Park Studios reclaims the license by paying the full amount that THQ put into the game. http://www.digitalspy.com/gaming/news/a453020/south-park-studios-request-stick-of-truth-pulled-from-thq-auction.html http://www.digitalspy.com/gaming/news/a453020/south-park-stu...
- Apocryphon 14y agoI hope whomever South Park Studios does bequeath the rights to the game to will treat it nicely. Poor Obsidian, even when they find a publisher who doesn't seem like it will abuse them, the publisher goes under. Perhaps their only friend are the fans, thanks be to Kickstarter.
- venomsnake 14y agoI think that Ubisoft is a death sentence for any creative studio, and obsidian is that. I thought with the 2004-5-6 Prince of Persia trilogy and Beyond good and Evil that Ubisoft has finally found out how to make great games that are also creative. But from all of their recent years - they ran Heroes into the ground, from the fabled AC franchise only the ACII is really good, and whatever they ship they manage to make unplayable with the uplay crap.
- kesun421 14y agoWith Sega's purchase of Relic, hopefully they can pick up the Homeworld franchise and do something with it again!
- afterburner 14y agoYes, or continue Dawn of War (maybe even go back to the first installment's RTS approach?)
- jfoutz 14y ago"Crytek, who is currently developing Homefront 2, has purchased the rights to the Homefront franchise." later on, they revealed it was $500,000
- jcurbo 14y agoI'm actually quite pleased with that, Sega seems like a good home for Relic. They seem to do ok with The Creative Assembly (Total War games). Homeworld 3 please :)
- angersock 14y agoCan somebody leak the source code for the old Red Faction games? Those didn't seem to be a franchise that got sold off, so maybe is abandonware?
- dpiers 14y agoMy first programming gig was an internship at Vigil Games when I was 20. I had an awesome summer there and worked with some amazing people; hopefully those who were still at the studio will find something soon.
- newman314 14y agoI hope Homefront 2 ends up being good. Homefront is a ton of fun to play.
- jgoney 14y agoExactly this! They can essentially start the story for Homefront 2 right where the first one stopped, and with Crytek's track record, it should look amazing as well. That is, if it's not already deep in development, which I think I remember hearing that it is.
- newman314 14y agoThey need to balance the guns somewhat, fix the spawn points and get people playing the DLC maps but otherwise multiplayer is fantastic. The ability to get additional toys per round is a huge mechanic IMO in replayability. I also look forward to the improved graphics that Crytek will bring. My only fear is that Crysis from what I have seen feels pretty cold at times so hopefully that does not bleed over. EDIT: I also don't get why Homefront was so panned by critics. The graphics obviously pale when compared to something like Crysis but like I said, I think they got many aspects of multiplayer very right.
- hef19898 14y agoOn the grafics part I completly agree with you, crytek games DO look great. Even if they botched it up somewhat with Crysis 2 at the beginning. Where they have to improve upon actually is the story and gameplay, Crysis 2 was a little disapointing there, I think. Crysis Warhead on th other hand was way better.
- snowmiser 14y agoI hate how people echo Saints Row and Company of Heroes whenever someone mentions THQ. Darksiders and Darksiders 2 (especially the latter) are brilliant games.
- runevault 14y agoVigil is the part of this that most interests me, and saddens in me in that the current word last I knew was no one had shown much interest in picking the studio up.
- TruthElixirX 14y agoI loved DSI. I hate DSII.
- yareally 14y agoMetro 2033 is most likely in good hands. The parent company that bought them owns Deep Silver, who published one of the great games of the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. series[1], which I think Metro pulls from. Random fun fact, but the first S.T.A.L.K.E.R. game was also published by THQ. Probably why THQ were so interested in Metro 2033, which came shortly after. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.T.A.L.K.E.R._%28series%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.T.A.L.K.E.R._%28series%29
- lloeki 14y ago> which I think Metro pulls from Metro 2033 is adapted from a russian '05 novel of the same name, while S.T.A.L.K.E.R is from both the '72 novel Stalker and its '79 movie. They bear no lineage.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- zobzu 14y agoSo long THQ. I hope SEGA will make good use of my favorite games.
- mikelat 14y agoI wish you had posted a better source of gaming journalism, I don't like IGN at all. http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2013/01/23/fin-thq-sells-off-most-studios-basically-done/ http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2013/01/23/fin-thq-sells-off...