4 ms·
The book "Powering the Future" also argues fuel will always outperform batteries, pointing out that both fuel and batteries store chemical energy, and that chem
by ealloc 14y ago
The book "Powering the Future" also argues fuel will always outperform batteries, pointing out that both fuel and batteries store chemical energy, and that chemical energy density is fundamentally contrained by physics:
Since all atoms are approximately the same size there is a limit to how many bonds/volume you can have, and since all chemical bonds are roughly the same amount of energy there's a limit on how much energy/volume you can store with chemical energy.
The book then argues that hydrocarbon fuels come very close to the ideal energy density, and have many other advantages over batteries (weight (they're formed with light elements), extremely safe byproducts CO2 H2O, simple ingredients).
- frankus 14y agoFrom an energy policy perspective that sounds about right, but from the standpoint of what's theoretically possible that would seem to be ignoring some really promising areas of research.