You're ruining all my fun with your calm debating. > I'm not saying the probability is > 50%, I'm saying it can be < 1%, but still over 0, and still be worth i

You're ruining all my fun with your calm debating. > I'm not saying the probability is > 50%, I'm saying it can be < 1%, but still over 0, and still be worth it. Well, we're simply going to have to disagree. I don't find endorsement by smart people compelling. We have plenty of evidence that medicine can extend lifespans, but we have no evidence that we'll figure out a safe way to revive someone cryogenically frozen and no reason to believe extension will reach infinity. If they only solve one of the two problems you're looking at wasting a lot of money on a very strange burial or a very disappointing revival. If p < 1% but > 0 and it's worth it to you, great. But don't kid yourself about it being an investment. It's a huge gamble. And I retain the right to consider gamblers suckers.