> If you visit some places full of dirt poor families, abandoned buildings and meth addicts, you'll get a nice glimpse why some might want it another way. Do y

> If you visit some places full of dirt poor families, abandoned buildings and meth addicts, you'll get a nice glimpse why some might want it another way. Do you really think complete control over another human being is morally acceptable, even if it prevents that person from becoming a drug addict? I mean, we could cure all drug addicts today by sending them to a prison camp with violent punishment for carrying drugs. But would that be preferable to actually having drug addicts? We can achieve a lot of things with force. The question is if the force itself creates more destruction than it prevents.