3 ms·
The site is a little unclear: it appears he wasn't prosecuted for the "2 girls" video, but rather "hours of videos in which females engaged in sex acts involvin
by slapshot 14y ago
The site is a little unclear: it appears he wasn't prosecuted for the "2 girls" video, but rather "hours of videos in which females engaged in sex acts involving human waste and animals." [1] His Wikipedia page lists some of the titles that suggest that a horse (horses?) and dogs were involved, as well as "evidence suggesting Isaacs' provided controlled substances to the actresses in his films to compel them to perform." [2]
[1] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2264024/Ira-Isaacs-Fetish-porn-producer-sentenced-years-federal-obscenity-case.html http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2264024/Ira-Isaacs-F...
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ira_Isaacs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ira_Isaacs
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- salmanapk 14y ago"During the trial, jurors were forced to watch hours of videos in which females engaged in sex acts involving human waste and animals." Made me chuckle.
- n3rdy 14y agoThis definitely puts the original article in a different perspective. It also answers my question whether the jurors were forced to watch the material. Governments solution to a man producing movies that sexually violate animals? Sexually violate 12 random jurors.
- tzs 14y agoPotential jurors would have been told during jury selection about the movies they would have to watch during the trial, and those who said they would have trouble watching would have been excused.