3 ms·
I don't think it is fair to dismiss it as a "mega lie". I am actually surprised, how thought out the encryption scheme is. The first version might have flaws, b
by ma2rten 14y ago
I don't think it is fair to dismiss it as a "mega lie". I am actually surprised, how thought out the encryption scheme is. The first version might have flaws, but at least they thought about the case that the CDN might be compromised and implemented a quite clever (but flawed) work-around. Most banks don't put such an effort into security of their website.
Time will show if they fix this flaw, or not.
- DigitalSea 14y agoMaybe not a lie in the sense of the word, but it's obvious looking at their crypto algorithm that at present it is a gimmicky feature. The lack of a strong encryption scheme doesn't degrade the service in my opinion and it's more of a feature to protect Mega and not its users like they are portraying it to be. Given the massive amount of backlash and scrutiny from experts and non-experts alike, Kim always seems to win in the end and I am sure they're already planning on hiring a cryptography master to help them write something more serious as we speak.
- Havoc 14y ago> at present it is a gimmicky feature Its also labelled beta.