I'm not so sure using encryption just to eliminate liability for themselves would go over all that well. It makes sense to me that they would lie about the pur

I'm not so sure using encryption just to eliminate liability for themselves would go over all that well. It makes sense to me that they would lie about the purpose. Certainly if they are advertising security for end users, they should deliver it properly, but honestly I doubt that is their actual intent. This seems to be the sort of 'security' that only needs to be strong enough that they can say with a straight face in court that they cannot break it themselves.