4 ms·
We were called by Apple to let us know; they specifically told us to completely block even artistic nudes. Although I'm not sure of their stance on photos of Mi
by 3pt14159 14y ago
We were called by Apple to let us know; they specifically told us to completely block even artistic nudes. Although I'm not sure of their stance on photos of Michaelangelo's David (see: http://500px.com/photo/765271 http://500px.com/photo/765271). I'll have to get someone on the phone over there.
(NSFA warning: Nipples)
- Simucal 14y agoWhy doesn't the Bing app have to adhere to these same restrictions?
- bookwormAT 14y agobecause the app store restrictions are guidelines how to please Apple, not rules. Apple can let hard porn through the app store and block letterpress if they like to. Maybe Bing is just a more important strategic partner than 500px
- roc 14y agoJust to be clear, I was wondering about some other circumstance -- perhaps naively -- because I thought Apple had seen the error in this sort of nonsense, so I wondered if there was some other explanation or consideration. If Apple is indeed getting back into the game of selective, uneven enforcement of their guidelines, it's a monumental fuck-up.
- adamgravitis 14y ago"a monumental fuck-up." - no pun intended, I'm sure ;-)
- jasonlotito 14y ago> If Apple is indeed getting back into the game of selective, uneven enforcement of their guidelines... This never stopped. Selective enforcement is a policy that they enforce, and have freely admitted to.
- jpxxx 14y agoYou submitted an ad with tits in it to an -American- broadcast network and asked them to run it during kids cartoons. They said no. Enjoy your free press. (Seeiously though: love your service)