4 ms·
> AT&T's intent isn't really relevant. That's definitely not legally true.
by jamesaguilar 14y ago
> AT&T's intent isn't really relevant.
That's definitely not legally true.
- redthrowaway 14y agoYou're absolutely right, and I'd call that a failing of the law. Just because someone intends to create a system with some degree of security does not mean people who access said unsecured system should be considered criminals.