2 ms·
All I'm trying to say that Erlang syntax is much more intuitive and readable, being derived from Prolog. I honestly can't see why should I use Haskell (except
by dschiptsov 14y ago
All I'm trying to say that Erlang syntax is much more intuitive and readable, being derived from Prolog.
I honestly can't see why should I use Haskell (except for being so clever) when I have Erlang, or at least one real advantage.
- mwotton 14y agowell, let's look. map f (h:t) = f h:map f t map f [] = [] member x (h:t) = x == h || member x t member _ [] = False I think the only difference is that you can't match for equality directly in the pattern.