To provide a more concrete objection, I'll say that a human-level AI would have to have a general and expandable framework for learning, and I don't think we re

To provide a more concrete objection, I'll say that a human-level AI would have to have a general and expandable framework for learning, and I don't think we really have any idea how to build one. Watson is cool and all (and probably the best current counterexample to my point), but it needed a lot of domain experts with doctorates to set it up to "understand" problems in a relatively limited field.