3 ms·
Yes. I'm glad something's happening to prevent recurrences, but I hate that it was necessary at all. It's more than likely that no politician would have cared a
by thirsteh 14y ago
Yes. I'm glad something's happening to prevent recurrences, but I hate that it was necessary at all. It's more than likely that no politician would have cared at all if he hadn't killed himself and that had caused a large amount of PR/public outcry.
I can't remember the last time I saw a post on Hacker News about donating to Aaron's defense fund, or about how ridiculous the charges against him were. (We already knew about JSTOR--why didn't we care?) There have been at least 300 different posts about him after he killed himself.
I blame myself for not doing enough, too, but I don't do something _because_ he committed suicide. This piling-on of posts seems odd and morbid to me. I'd hate to live in a country/world where the best choice if you want to effect change really is to kill yourself.
(As a thought exercise to show how the death was "necessary": How much time have you spent caring about/working to assist in a similar, active case after Aaron's suicide?)
- danso 14y agoDon't blame yourself. Aaron and his associates were the closest to the case and it was incumbent upon them to do the PR necessary to raise the outcry. However, according to recent accounts, Aaron felt barred from fully presenting his cause. It was a damned-if-you-do-and-damned-if-you-don't situation for Aaron, which is a damned tragedy.