4 ms·
I like the overall scheme. If information overload for women is the hard part, that's the thing to focus on. That said, how will you attract men to a site whe
by hapless 14y ago
I like the overall scheme. If information overload for women is the hard part, that's the thing to focus on.
That said, how will you attract men to a site where they are likely to be filtered into oblivion? The mainstream dating sites may, in reality, be useless to many men, but by giving subscribers the ability to actively do something, they may feel like they're making contact.
Conversely, how will you handle women who "shoot too high" ? (i.e. If female subscribers filter too hard, they may not get the response rates they desire.)
- amirn 14y agoFunnily enough, we've found if you make it enjoyable for women, it's more enjoyable for men. It's true that some guys will get the harsh end of the filter stick. But with this method it's easier to know where exactly you're failing. If you get knocked out at first selection each time - you need to improve your answers. If you get to the end repeatedly but have no luck - maybe a better photo.
- harlanlewis 14y agoI think you have the actions to improve reversed.
- amirn 14y agoWhat do you mean?
- harlanlewis 14y agoNothing serious :) Getting knocked out at the first selection likely has more to do with the photo than the answers - visceral filters occur first.
- amirn 14y ago"visceral filters occur first" - Agreed. Except girls only see the photo of the last guy remaining - so all they have to go on is the answers ;)