>It doesn't seem like you are really in disagreement. Oh, I'm very, very much in disagreement. It's not just about "preference" as if preference is arbitrary.

>It doesn't seem like you are really in disagreement. Oh, I'm very, very much in disagreement. It's not just about "preference" as if preference is arbitrary. Superficial syntactic preference IS arbitrary. Substancial syntax issues are not. Brainfuck is not just left alone because people don't "prefer" its syntax. That's reading it in reverse. People don't prefer Brainfuck's syntax because it is objectively, and for reasons related to human psychology, cognition, etc bad. E.g it makes it measurably difficult to discern different program states.