2 ms·
A simple counter-argument: Why is Smalltalk (an archetypal 'dynamic' language) so darned easy to work with, and (very importantly) get right? Is it coincidenc
by fractallyte 14y ago
A simple counter-argument:
Why is Smalltalk (an archetypal 'dynamic' language) so darned easy to work with, and (very importantly) get right?
Is it coincidence that much research in modern programming languages and concepts is being conducted using Smalltalk-like environments? (Examples: http://scg.unibe.ch/research/helvetia http://scg.unibe.ch/research/helvetia, http://www.viewpointsresearch.org/ http://www.viewpointsresearch.org/)