3 ms·
I don't really see why RubyJS would be better than PHP.js. And I'm definitely not saying that PHP.js should be used. [edit] To be more specific, I really don'
by arcatek 14y ago
I don't really see why RubyJS would be better than PHP.js.
And I'm definitely not saying that PHP.js should be used.
[edit] To be more specific, I really don't see the point of using a third-party library when the native methods are available. IMHO, if you choose a language, you should stick with it.
- sebilasse 14y agoRubyJS creator here. I was just missing so many (native) methods in javascript. i liked the standard library of javascript and there is an extensive public ruby testsuite that i could use to test my implementation against. Plus i liked the idea of taking something that already works elsewhere and translate it JS, instead of coming up with my own API. IMO it's the same as using underscore/lodash, stringjs, etc, just all in the same library with the same coding standards and interoperability between classes.
- ericb 14y agoWhat is the license currently? It says Affero in the presentation, but github shows MIT license?