The headline is wrong, it would not be limited to Boeing 787 (which is sensible, as LiIon batteries aren't combustible just on that plane). Anyway, it seems nob

The headline is wrong, it would not be limited to Boeing 787 (which is sensible, as LiIon batteries aren't combustible just on that plane). Anyway, it seems nobody quoted in the article really thinks a ban on the batteries would cover devices which uses the batteries. So I would think the inference the article is drumming up isn't looking very likely at all.