> I did say that if I had to chose between "federal crime" or prank that I'd chose prank. Sure, but that's a false dichotomy. The author was under no such cons

> I did say that if I had to chose between "federal crime" or prank that I'd chose prank. Sure, but that's a false dichotomy. The author was under no such constraint, so it was sensationalist and misleading for him to keep referring to it as a prank. And when I say that, I'm not casting judgement here. The Boston Tea Party and the Rosa Parks protest weren't pranks either.