4 ms·
I've been waiting for people to figure this out. It's not just kids who have shorter attention spans. Though I am blessed with friends who still call me "young
by mechanical_fish 18y ago
I've been waiting for people to figure this out.
It's not just kids who have shorter attention spans. Though I am blessed with friends who still call me "young man", I'm no longer a kid, and I'm a veteran of many years of lecture-based courses. But that era is over. There's no longer any technical reason to deliver lectures in uninterrupted fifty-minute blocks. And it turns out that they only reason I ever liked that format is that I didn't have alternatives.
I've attended so, so many physics lectures. They break naturally into chunks: Some scene-setting ("let's talk about conservation of momentum in two dimensions"), proposing a problem ("here's an ice rink with two hockey pucks that collide"), a derivation (equation, equation, chalk dust, erasure, equation, more chalk dust, fix the sign error), a summary ("look, momentum is conserved! And we can draw the following general lesson..."), questions from the audience, and finally a bunch of homework problems.
How great it would be to have each of these chunks be recorded as separate bits of video. You could play through the scene-setting and the summary multiple times. You could play through the derivation at higher speed, slowing down or repeating the bits where the prof makes a subtle point but speeding through the parts which are obvious to you. You can skip the student questions that you already understand but play through the subtle ones more than once.
About the only disadvantage of this way of learning is that it's kind of isolating. It would be nice to combine it with lots of lab-type gatherings where all the students can join together and feel like a team.
---
[1] I had a few professors who avoided using chalkboards. They would provide handouts with the day's derivations and equations on them, then use an overhead projector with slides. (This was all before Powerpoint was widely available in academia.)
This was a mixed bag. It worked okay, but it wasn't an obvious big win over chalkboards. One advantage of the chalkboard is that it is very flexible: you can gesture at it, redo it on demand, or scrawl circles and arrows all over it. Another advantage is that it is typically huge, offering you lots of opportunity to, say, write Maxwell's equations in a box to the left and leave them up through the whole lecture for reference. Finally, chalkboard derivations go up slowly (sometimes really slowly, if the writer is not well practiced), which can be bad, but which also makes it easy for the professor to interject meaningful comments.
But I think the availability of digital video playback, cheap cameras, and nonlinear editing changes this problem a lot.
- ph0rque 18y agoI am the type of person who prefers written text to video... I can envision the following: 1. Scene-setting --> introductory paragraph 2. Proposing a problem --> video/animation of the problem at hand 3. Derivation --> written and recorded in something like EtherPad, so one can see not only the result, but the process of writing it. 4. Summary --> summary paragraph 5. Questions --> nested comments a la HN/reddit/etc. As a bonus, add the ability to highlight and right-click on any part of the text, and add a comment there.
- mechanical_fish 18y agoI also prefer written text to video. But I'm prepared to admit that there are certain things that come through better on video, that there are quite a few learners who learn better via video, and that great lectures have a wonderful charm that complements written material nicely. Feynman's transcribed lectures are great, but videos of Feynman's live delivery are extra great. The Long Island accent alone is worth the price of admission. Feynman sounds like a human being, a guy who lives down the street, not like some disembodied Platonic ideal of genius. I've also been in quite a few classes where the textbook was simply useless but the lecturer saved the day. [1] (And the opposite, as well.) And your ideas all sound great. Obviously there will be lots of room for experimentation. It's going to take many years to fully explore our new genres. --- [1] I would pay cash money for a video of Neil Ashcroft's graduate stat mech lectures. Or Roald Hoffmann on the band structure of solids -- although his textbook, written by him, isn't bad either; they complement each other perfectly, by design.
- ph0rque 18y ago> I'm prepared to admit that there are certain things that come through better on video, that there are quite a few learners who learn better via video, and that great lectures have a wonderful charm that complements written material nicely. Same here... there's no reason one can't have both for each of the 5 points (both text and video)