3 ms·

WikiLeaks: Aaron Swartz assisted WikiLeaks, may have been a source

• deleted 14y ago
  [deleted]
• deleted 14y ago
  [deleted]
• MacsHeadroom 14y ago
  "Due to the investigation into the Secret Service involvement with #AaronSwartz we have decided to disclose the following facts (1-3) " https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/292503580135538688 https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/292503580135538688 "1. Aaron Swartz assisted WikiLeaks #aaronwartz (1/3)" https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/292503892569239552 https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/292503892569239552 "2. Aaron Swartz was in communication with Julian Assange, including during 2010 and 2011" https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/292504484016439296 https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/292504484016439296 "3. We have strong reasons to believe, but cannot prove, that Aaron Swartz was a WikiLeaks source. #aaronswartz" https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/292504975865692160 https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/292504975865692160
• drucken 14y ago
  So Wikileak's famed "Anonymity for sources" does not extend to them if they are dead? Poor show, Wikileaks (assuming the Twitter account poster is in fact associated with Wikileaks).