3 ms·
Not sure about the veracity of this, but: https://twitter.com/AlBaker_Dev/status/292415396684918784 https://twitter.com/AlBaker_Dev/status/292415396684918784
by bhauer 14y ago
Not sure about the veracity of this, but:
https://twitter.com/AlBaker_Dev/status/292415396684918784 https://twitter.com/AlBaker_Dev/status/292415396684918784
"That was fixed in 2011, Spring 3.0.6 and 2.5.6SEC03, enjoy!"
- moondowner 14y agoIt's valid. Here's more info: http://support.springsource.com/security/cve-2011-2730 http://support.springsource.com/security/cve-2011-2730 And here's an overview for all Spring modules: http://support.springsource.com/security/springsource-all http://support.springsource.com/security/springsource-all
- andrewcooke 14y ago3.0.6 and 2.5.6SEC03 require explicit configuration to fix this - they are not safe by default. 3.1 is safe without config. see http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/The-ghost-of-a-Spring-Framework-bug-haunts-old-code-1786850.html http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/The-ghost-of-a-Spring...