3 ms·
It's not that easy. From papers cited it may be easy to deduce who is the author. Typically, there are projects resulting in many papers, not single ones - so i
by stared 14y ago
It's not that easy. From papers cited it may be easy to deduce who is the author. Typically, there are projects resulting in many papers, not single ones - so it is natural, and desired, to refer to previous works.
Additionally, it may be easier to find if an author is not committing self-plagiarism (sending the almost the same thing to a few different places).
More on that topic:
http://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/625/open-versus-blind-reviewing-process http://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/625/open-versus-...
- scott_s 14y agoThat is also a problem with double-blind reviews, and I'm quite familiar with the problems (and annoyances) of anonymizing a paper. However, my main point was about making the reviewers sign their name. I am unaware of a CS community that does so.