they've stated this position before: "Hooked on just saying no" (1989) http://www.economist.com/printedition/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13251312 http://www.econo

they've stated this position before: "Hooked on just saying no" (1989) http://www.economist.com/printedition/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13251312 http://www.economist.com/printedition/displaystory.cfm?story... to get a better sense of where they're reacting to the full briefing from this weekend's issue is worth a read: "On the trail of the traffickers" http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13234157 http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13234157 "Sniffy customers" http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13234124 http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13234124 "A toker's guide" http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13234134 http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13234134 "In America, lessons learned" http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13234144 http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13234144 and overall their perspective is well summarized by the cover art: http://www.economist.com/printedition/displayCover.cfm?url=/images/20090307/20090307issuecovUS400.jpg http://www.economist.com/printedition/displayCover.cfm?url=/...