Which pharma cases? I noticed the if. It's still a rather bold statement. "Soandso is an idiot." "Do you have any proof?" "If they think this, then they're an

Which pharma cases? I noticed the if. It's still a rather bold statement. "Soandso is an idiot." "Do you have any proof?" "If they think this, then they're an idiot. Have you provided evidence to the contrary?" It's like saying Stephen Hawking is an idiot if he thinks the holocaust never happened. Can you provide me with evidence that Stephen Hawking thinks the holocaust happened? Is it really okay to call someone an idiot on a conditional if you have zero proof?