3 ms·
I think I'd disagree back :). It is not a new or recent issue that the cost of development for mobile was notoriously expensive on hardware, there was a residua
by edderly 14y ago
I think I'd disagree back :). It is not a new or recent issue that the cost of development for mobile was notoriously expensive on hardware, there was a residual hope that emulators would suffice. Simultaneously there has been constant demand for hobbyists or industry to use commodity capable hardware.
I stated "The success of the Pi is really a textbook example of why you want good marketing, product management and strategic pricing plus a bit of timing/luck." as a round about way that corporations should sometimes make bold decisions which may not result in a direct profit.
Roughly knowing the cost of TI's SoC I would assert that TI would have been better off aiming their SoC/board combo at the right price point and perhaps with a detached org to support it.
- Tyrant505 14y agoOf course this is all interesting. But times are very different! Radio Shack hobbyists were at the forefront. There were not SO many of them.. but because the latest chips and other doohickies were fairly expensive in today's world, allowed Radio Shack to prosper. We are both on HN, so we are a bit different than normal population... Globalization changed that, I'm in NYC, you?