4 ms·
So there's no need for it.
by vy8vWJlco 14y ago
So there's no need for it.
- tptacek 14y agoNon sequitur.
- vy8vWJlco 14y agoTo clarify, by your own assertion, the CFAA isn't necessary to address specific claims of damage (you have suggested copyright). Removing it would place the justification of damage (for example, copyright) back at the center of the debate, where I think it should be.