Yes, assault weapons and magazines are what I was referring to. I understand the objections, and I sympathize; I don't really have a horse in this race either w

Yes, assault weapons and magazines are what I was referring to. I understand the objections, and I sympathize; I don't really have a horse in this race either way (I'm keenly aware that if so inclined, The State will happily squash me like a bug, whether or not I own a fully auto AK-47 that fires armor-piercing bullets). My point is that there is clearly a policy distinction between what liberals are calling "common sense protections", and legislation to _proactively take every gun from every gun owner_. There is a spectrum of opinion wider than [x] gun-grabber [ ] non-gun-grabber, and I don't believe any opinions should be dismissed a priori. There are real arguments to be made in favor of gun regulation, even if those arguments are wrong; holding such opinions does not necessarily mean one is secretly in favor of repealing all gun rights.