It's fascinating to read the report by the professor mentioned in the article: http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~regan/chess/fidelity/ACPcover-and-report.pdf http://w

It's fascinating to read the report by the professor mentioned in the article: http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~regan/chess/fidelity/ACPcover-and-report.pdf http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~regan/chess/fidelity/ACPcover-an... The relevant conclusion: "My model projects that for a 2300 player to achieve the high computer correspondence shown in the nine tested games, the odds against are almost a million-to-one. The control data and bases for comparison, which are wholly factual, show several respects in which the performance is exceptional even for a 2700-player, and virtually unprecedented for an untitled player." A NYT article from last year on his methodology: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/20/science/a-computer-program-to-detect-possible-cheating-in-chess.html?ref=science http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/20/science/a-computer-program... and more details on his site: http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~regan/chess/fidelity/ http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~regan/chess/fidelity/