3 ms·
You say it's "ridiculously lengthy," and I say it's not. This is what we have procedures, judges and juries for.
by maxharris 14y ago
You say it's "ridiculously lengthy," and I say it's not.
This is what we have procedures, judges and juries for.
- jeswin 14y ago7 years (which is what I read) is a "ridiculously lengthy" prison term for downloading papers from the internet for no financial gain. How can one see it any other way? This isn't about the judge and jury. 7 years is what the prosecutors would have asked, and we are discussing the fairness in their approach.
- maxharris 14y agoIt's not about who gains. His actions violated the rights of all of the people at JSTOR and MIT. In a murder trial, you can't properly argue that the killer ought to face lighter charges because his crime was not motivated by personal financial gain. This is relevant here because we're talking about criminal court. I'm not saying that what Swartz did is the same as murder. However, the same concept applies in both cases.