"open, collaborative resource like WikiTravel should be owned by a profit-driven entity that had acquired it and was trying to monetise it" Same could be said

"open, collaborative resource like WikiTravel should be owned by a profit-driven entity that had acquired it and was trying to monetise it" Same could be said of StackOverflow and Github (Stack and Git weren't acquired, but are both VC-funded). Many wikis are profit-driven too. Open collaboration takes time and resources. Wikipedia shows it can be achieved as a non-profit, but I don't think it's surprising that it can be achieved by a commercial organisation too, as long as its open about it and respectful of contributions.