3 ms·
>But it could just mean adjusting ratings and making sure that proof of age is required when purchasing classified content. For the government to do that would
by mistercow 14y ago
>But it could just mean adjusting ratings and making sure that proof of age is required when purchasing classified content.
For the government to do that would entail amending the constitution, since SCOTUS has already ruled that doing so violates the First Amendment.
- TheMiller 14y agoVarious exceptions to freedom of speech have been upheld by the Supreme Court; this constitutional right is not absolute. If significant new research results appeared, it would not be surprising if the court to revisited the issue to consider whether another exception is warranted.