4 ms·

I agree, very ballsy art. I don't believe I have ever explicitly seen a law here in the US (I know this is UK, just comparing) forbidding cameras within a pack

I agree, very ballsy art. I don't believe I have ever explicitly seen a law here in the US (I know this is UK, just comparing) forbidding cameras within a package, but I would think there would be some law on the books somewhere they could apply (not saying that is a good thing, esp in light of recent events).

fnordfnordfnord 14y ago
CFAA, wire fraud. It fits any crime.
- sesqu 14y ago
  General espionage / covert surveillance should cover it better.
damian2000 14y ago
A reason it might not be allowed is due to fire risk - anything operated from batteries is supposed to be turned off, and with the battery terminals isolated ... these are guidelines from the postal services ... http://www.ups.com/content/us/en/resources/ship/packaging/guidelines/batteries.html http://www.ups.com/content/us/en/resources/ship/packaging/gu... http://www.royalmail.com/despatch-inward-mail-services/hints-and-tips/restricted-goods http://www.royalmail.com/despatch-inward-mail-services/hints...
cynwoody 14y ago
Just be glad Carmen Ortiz is not on the case. I'm sure she'd come up with a few decades' worth of counts.