3 ms·
The problem is, he violated the company's trust by sending sensitive information to unauthorized third parties.
by GFischer 14y ago
The problem is, he violated the company's trust by sending sensitive information to unauthorized third parties.
- AnIrishDuck 14y agoBingo. He also most likely exposed additional valuable and proprietary IP to a third party that a) has no formal business relationship with the company and b) operates in a country notorious for IP theft. Firing him is a no-brainer here, if this story is even true. EDIT: he also opened a large portion of the company's codebase to potential sabotage. If I was in Company X's shoes right now I'd be doing a full audit of everything this joker has touched since he started, in addition to a full internal security audit of everything this mystery third party had access to. This kind of security breach is a Big Deal.
- dalore 14y agoBut he would have had those companies sign an NDA (in theory) so they are in effect umbrella'd into his.
- justinhj 14y agoIf ndas worked that way there'd be no point in ndas.