I don't like the argument here. I mean, in the technical sense. It seems to attempt to lever facts about a specific situation into an otherwise unsupported gen

I don't like the argument here. I mean, in the technical sense. It seems to attempt to lever facts about a specific situation into an otherwise unsupported generalization. A couple of things leapt out at me - a) Aaron wasn't subject to the pressures of industry in Silicon Valley. He'd chosen a different path, and b) the author offers no support for his implication that the suicide rate in tech is higher than other industries. The article didn't hang together for me and I'm left wondering if its just opportunistic drivel or a fair portrayal of a real concern that's been poorly argued.