3 ms·
I run a fairly small site. We're upto around 7 million hits a month, still pretty tiny. Our costs right now are fairly low, but recently I made a post inquiring
by ajkirwin 18y ago
I run a fairly small site. We're upto around 7 million hits a month, still pretty tiny. Our costs right now are fairly low, but recently I made a post inquiring how to cluster efficiently, because we needed more bandwidth available (And we were going to use a few 10mbit servers).
Someone suggested that we use s3. This would've tripled our bandwidth costs.
This is why I believe it's expensive.
- easp 18y agoAnd how would your s3 bandwidth costs compare to running your clustered servers? Is the DIY storage triply redundant? I'm not saying you made the wrong decision, or the right one, but is the comparison apples-to-apples?