You can always support any position with ample evidence. The problem is balance. Chomsky doesn't cite the evidence that does not support him, even though there

You can always support any position with ample evidence. The problem is balance. Chomsky doesn't cite the evidence that does not support him, even though there is always plenty of such evidence. This is considered normal, but it means you always only get part of the story, need to get the other parts elsewhere and then make up your mind. It's daunting.